SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2025
Safety and efficacy of gastrointestinal motility agents following elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and comparison of machine learning models for predicting postoperative ileus after posterior thoracolumbar fracture surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Advancing enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for pediatric laparoscopic-assisted small intestinal malformation repair.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Modernizing perioperative fasting: Liberal clear liquids, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and point-of-care gastric ultrasound.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative ileus (POI) is a frequent complication after elective colorectal surgery, delaying gastrointestinal (GI) recovery and discharge. While pharmacologic agents such as laxatives and prokinetics are often included in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols, their efficacy and safety remain uncertain.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the effect of Gastrointestinal (GI) motility agents on postoperative recovery in elective colorectal surgery. Primary outcomes included GI-2 recovery (tolerance of solid diet and stool passage), time to first defaecation, and safety endpoints. Data was pooled using random-effects models.
resultsSeven RCTs involving 849 patients were included. GI motility agents significantly accelerated GI-2 recovery (mean difference -1.01 days; 95% CI -1.29 to -0.73; p < 0.001) and reduced time to first defaecation (mean difference -1.07 days; 95% CI -1.40 to -0.73; p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in safety outcomes, including anastomotic leak (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.77), nasogastric tube reinsertion (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.51), or readmission rates (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.62 to 1.72).
conclusionMotility agents enhance postoperative GI recovery without compromising safety in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Given their low cost, wide availability, and favourable safety profile, gastrointestinal motility agents may be considered for integration into ERAS protocols. However, further high-quality, standardised trials are needed to confirm their benefits across diverse surgical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.