ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Innovative approaches for the treatment of stroke: a recent update.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic Mechanisms Regulating Ferroptosis in Ischemic Stroke: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Targets.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- CRISPR-Based Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The domain of stroke therapy is indeed undergoing rapid advancement, characterized by the emergence of innovative strategies such as stem cell therapy, exosomes, and gene editing methodologies. Although existing treatments, including thrombolysis and endovascular interventions, have enhanced stroke outcomes, but are limited by challenges such as narrow therapeutic windows and potential adverse effects. Novel therapeutic approaches, particularly those incorporating stem cells-such as mesenchymal (MSCs), embryonic, and induced pluripotent (iPSCs)-are exhibiting considerable promise. These cellular entities and their derivatives have been shown to facilitate brain repair by diminishing inflammation and supporting the regeneration of neurons and blood vessels. Especially, exosomes which are capable of promoting tissue repair and neuroprotection without immune rejection have proven to be significant. Furthermore, gene editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 provide avenues to augment stem cell therapies through the modification of genes implicated in stroke pathogenesis. For instance, the targeting of genes such as DAPK1, which are associated with cell death and neuronal injury post-stroke, may potentially enhance the survival and integration of transplanted stem cells, thereby contributing to improved functional recovery. Also, the use of organoid models has represented another cutting-edge research frontier, which provides a platform to study stroke pathophysiology and test potential therapies in a controlled environment, but challenges persist and hence factors such as the survival and differentiation of transplanted cells, the risk of immune rejection, and the necessity for standardized protocols require resolution. By bridging these gaps, the potential for more effective and regenerative stroke treatments will become a reality, paving the way for better patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40439886What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.