ReviewArchives of virology2025
ACE2, a therapeutic target of COVID-19, needs to be treated with caution.
Review in Archives of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 spike S1-ACE2 binding interaction and downregulation of ACE2 gene expression by Malaysian stingless bee honey and its bioactive compound, stilbamidine (SDC).Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Multi-epitope vaccine targeting SARS-CoV-2 omicron S and N proteins promotes enhanced immunity: a computational approach.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- ACE2: Friend or Foe in Post-COVID-19 Neurodegeneration?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- ACE2-Decoy-Conjugated PLGA-PEG Nanoparticles Loaded with Nafamostat for Potent Antiviral Activity.Viruses · 2025Article
- Editorial: Endocrine complications of COVID-19: short and long.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has garnered significant attention for its crucial role in infection by both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Consequently, it has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for treatment of COVID-19. It is therefore important to understand the mechanisms and modes of action of current and future treatments involving ACE2. Three important strategies have been explored in previous studies: (1) interruption of the interaction between ACE2 and the coronavirus spike protein using compounds or monoclonal antibodies, (2) capturing the extracellular virus by employing soluble ACE2 as a decoy, and (3) reducing the expression or inhibiting the activity of ACE2 through genetic approaches or drug intervention. However, the third strategy of inhibiting ACE2 activity as a means of treating COVID-19 is potentially risky, and the wisdom of pursuing this approach is subject to debate. Here, the advisability of using anti-ACE2 treatment in the context of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infections is challenged by reviewing the physiological function of ACE2 and the mechanism of viral entry, emphasizing the pathological impairment of ACE2 that occurs during SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection and arguing that the potential hazards associated with ACE2 impairment should be given more attention. Because of the important concerns regarding the potential side effects of ACE2 inhibition, researchers are strongly urged to approach this issue with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40439840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.