ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Overview of Orphan Medicines in European Union: An Analysis of Regulatory and Technical-Scientific Aspects.
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulatory Alignment on Surrogate Endpoints for Slowly Progressive Ultra-Rare Neurological Diseases: Bridging the Gap Between Biomarker Science and Global Regulatory Acceptance.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Orphan Medicinal Product Regulation was adopted in the EU in 2000 to encourage the implementation of medicines for rare diseases. Providing a current overview of its effects, this study was performed on medicines with active orphan designation authorised in the EU until January 17, 2024. MATERIALS AND
methodsBased on the Community Register of orphan medicinal products for human use, active orphan designations of medicines that have been granted marketing authorisation (MA) were included in the study. General information on medicines, orphan designations, and MAs was collected from web-based sources and analysed using descriptive statistics.
resultsSince 2000, 149 medicines with clinical indications with active orphan designation have been granted MA in the EU, making a total of 184 authorised orphan indications. Most medicines (96;64.4%) received standard MA, while 33 (22.1%) received conditional MA and 20 (13.4%) MA under exceptional circumstances. Sixty-five (43.6%) medicines were biological products, mainly monoclonal antibodies, recombinant human peptides or enzymes, or gene therapies. Active orphan designations with outcome for MA were primarily for indications for neoplasms or endocrine, nutritional or metabolic diseases. Orphan indications were licensed after a mean of 67.2 months (range 6-249 months) from designation date. For 93 (50.5%) orphan designations, the prevalence estimate of the condition in the EU was ≤ 1/10,000.
conclusionsDespite pharmacological advances, a limited number of orphan medicines have been authorised in the EU since the entry into force of the Orphan Regulation, making the lack of available medicines for rare diseases still a public health problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.