ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Chromosomal abnormalities of embryos from sporadic and recurrent miscarriages: a tertiary center experience.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chromosomal Roadblocks in Male Fertility: Mechanisms, Risk Factors and Syndromes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbout 10-15% of all clinical pregnancies end in early spontaneous abortion (SA) and almost half of miscarriages are caused by fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is when this situation occurs two or more times before the 20th week of pregnancy. Our study aimed to find the types and frequencies of chromosomal abnormalities in SA and RPL and to perform a comparative analysis.
methodsCases between 4 and 20 weeks of age were included in the study. The karyotypes of abortions were established using standard cytogenetic analysis, as well as QF-PCR (Quantitative Fluorescence-PCR) method. Comparative cytogenetic analysis was performed between the groups based on miscarriage numbers (SA and RPL) and maternal age (< 35 and ≥ 35).
resultsMaternal age, gestational week, number of miscarriages, and karyotype analysis results were recorded (n = 176). The study included one hundred and six cases with RPL and 70 cases with SA. Abnormal karyotype was detected in 80 cases (45.5%). The most common abnormality was autosomal trisomies (n = 35). There was a significant statistical difference between SA and RPL groups regarding 45, X (monosomy) (p = 0.003). The least chromosomal abnormality type in both groups (SA and RPL) was structural abnormalities (1.4% and 4.7%, respectively). In cases with aneuploidy karyotype, maternal age (≥ 35) was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of polyploidy.
conclusionFoetal chromosomal karyotypes are still a significant cause of miscarriage. Our findings highlight the diversity of both maternal age and chromosomal abnormalities in spontaneous and recurrent miscarriages. This is also the first study from Türkiye to perform comparative cytogenetic analysis according to these groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40439801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.