Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439800›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

Revolutionizing stroke prediction: a systematic review of AI-powered wearable technologies for early detection of stroke.

Ayat Alhakeem, Bipin Chaurasia, Muhammad Mohsin Khan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayat AlhakeemWeiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, USA.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, 44200, Nepal. trozexa@gmail.com.
Muhammad Mohsin KhanNeurosurgery dept, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable technology, combined with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms, opens up new frontiers for continuously monitoring physiological or behavioural data, allowing the identification of stroke risk factors at an earlier stage. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, following the PRISMA guidelines. The search aimed to include studies using wearable devices incorporating AI/ML models for real-time stroke prediction. The reviewed studies were characterized according to methodology, population characteristics, device specifications, specific AI/ML models employed, outcome measures such as predictive accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and their main findings. In our review, we identified 5 studies that met our inclusion criteria.The review also finds that AI-enhanced wearables may offer the accurate prediction of stroke events, with most studies reporting high predictive performance. Sensor-equipped wearable devices to measure vital parameters, such as blood pressure and heart rate variability, when combined with AI models, can provide greater sensitivity and very good specificity in identifying early signs of diseases. However, differences in the accuracy of devices and a lack of transparency in AI algorithms imply some practical challenges. These findings highlight the potential of wearable technologies driven by AI-ML for non-invasive, real-time stroke monitoring and risk assessment, although further research will be required to optimize model reliability and device usability. This review consolidates current evidence supporting the clinical application of wearable AI/ML technology and advocates for its advancement in stroke prevention and patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceStrokeWearable Electronic DevicesAlgorithmsEarly DiagnosisHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.