ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2025
Supervision and Support for Advanced Practice Providers Entering Psychiatric Practice.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the reviewThis review examines the role of advanced practice providers (APPs), such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants, in psychiatric practice and related supervision considerations. RECENT
findingsThe number of psychiatric APPs has increased significantly in recent years, with data indicating substantial workforce expansion. APPs receive substantially fewer supervised clinical hours in training than psychiatrists. Current literature suggests that APPs report perceived feelings of inadequacy in their initial practice years, reinforcing the need for structured supervision and post-graduate training programs. Standardized best practices for APP supervision remain largely undefined. The authors critically examined recent literature related to APP practice in psychiatry and provide recommendations for a multi-tiered supervision model, ongoing competency assessments and quality monitoring, and organizational oversight to support successful integration of APPs into psychiatric practice. Future research and evaluation should focus on assessing the efficacy of supervision strategies and their impact on APP clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40439798What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.