ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Nutritional management and practices in patients with bronchiolitis on non-invasive ventilation using a total face mask: an international survey in French network.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feeding or Failing? Rethinking Nutrition Therapy in Pediatric Critical Care.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiolitis is a major cause of respiratory failure in infants, necessitating non-invasive ventilation (NIV). While total face masks (TFM) are an alternative to nasal interfaces for NIV, they pose unique challenges for enteral feeding due to their design, which can limit airway access and increase the risk of complications. This study aimed to investigate the feeding practices of pediatric intensivists managing bronchiolitis patients using TFM for NIV. A cross-sectional survey (SurveyMonkey® software (San Matteo, California, USA)) was conducted among pediatric intensivists in the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatrique (GFRUP) across four French-speaking countries. The survey, consisting of 11 multiple-choice questions, assessed clinical practices related to TFM use and enteral feeding, including initiation timing, feeding methods, and associated complications. From January 2024 to April 2024, 33 intensivists from 10 units and 4 countries (France, Switzerland, Belgium, Canada) answered the survey. All physicians used routinely TFM with 40% of them using it as a first-line NIV interface. Enteral feeding was commonly initiated within 6 h of TFM initiation, with 72% of clinicians waiting for a stabilization period of 3 to 6 h. The majority (85%) employed gastric feeding, with a low incidence of severe complications reported. Vomiting was the most frequent issue, while aspiration pneumonia was rare.
conclusionsDespite the challenges associated with TFM, enteral feeding is widely practiced among pediatric intensivists, with a cautious approach to initiation and a low complication rate. These findings highlight the need for individualized feeding strategies and further research to optimize feeding practices in this population. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Total face masks (TFM) are increasingly used as an alternative to nasal or naso-buccal interfaces for non invasive ventilation in children. TFM may complicate enteral feeding with limited data available on feeding partances and related complications in this context. WHAT IS NEW: • This multicountry survey reveals taht enteral feeding is commonly implemented in children receiving non invasive ventilation via TFM, typically initiated early after clinical stabilization. The low incidence of severe complications supports the overall safety of this approach when applied with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40439758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.