ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
mpMRI-based habitat analysis for predicting prognoses in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a multicenter study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the value of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)-based habitat analysis for predicting prognoses in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), and to develop combined models by integrating habitat analysis with clinical predictors.
methodsThis retrospective study included 503 HGSOC patients from four centers. A K-means algorithm was used to identify voxel clusters and generate habitats on mpMRI. Radiomics features were extracted from each habitat sub-region. After feature selection, habitat models were developed to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify clinical predictors and construct clinical models. Combined models were developed by integrating habitat signatures with clinical predictors. Model performance was evaluated using C-index and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic area under the curves (AUCs).
resultsCompared with the clinical models (OS: 0.713 and 0.695; PFS: 0.727 and 0.700) and habitat models (OS: 0.707 and 0.672; PFS: 0.627 and 0.641), the combined models integrating habitat features and clinical independent predictors such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OS: 0.752 and 0.745; PFS: 0.784 and 0.754) achieved the highest C-indices for predicting OS and PFS in the internal validation cohort and external test cohort. The combined models also achieved the highest AUCs in all cohorts.
conclusionThe habitat models based on mpMRI demonstrated potential value in predicting the prognoses of HGSOC patients, but no significant advantages over the clinical models. The combined models were expected to improve the prognoses from the level of individual clinical characteristics and habitat features reflecting intratumoral heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40439719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.