ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Evaluation of out-of-distribution detection methods for data shifts in single-cell transcriptomics.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AnnQ: reference-based quantification of cellular abnormality at single-cell resolution.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Conformal inference for reliable single cell RNA-seq annotation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- AI alignment is all your need for future drug discovery.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic cell-type annotation methods assign cell-type labels to new, unlabeled datasets by leveraging relationships from a reference RNA-seq atlas. However, new datasets may include labels absent from the reference dataset or exhibit feature distributions that diverge from it. These scenarios can significantly affect the reliability of cell type predictions, a factor often overlooked in current automatic annotation methods. The field of out-of-distribution detection (OOD), primarily focused on computer vision, addresses the identification of instances that differ from the training distribution. Therefore, the implementation of OOD methods in the context of novel cell type annotation and data shift detection for single-cell transcriptomics may enhance annotation accuracy and trustworthiness. We evaluate six OOD detection methods: LogitNorm, MC dropout, Deep Ensembles, Energy-based OOD, Deep NN, and Posterior networks, for their annotation and OOD detection performance in both synthetical and real-life application settings. We show that OOD detection methods can accurately identify novel cell types and demonstrate potential to detect significant data shifts in non-integrated datasets. Moreover, we find that integration of the OOD datasets does not interfere with OOD detection of novel cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.