Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439458›Full record

ArticleChild development

Links Between Child Executive Function and Adjustment: A Three-Site Study.

Laure Lu Chen, Jean Anne Heng, Chengyi Xu, Michelle R Ellefson, Miryam Edwards, Hana D'Souza, Elian Fink, Mikeda Jess, Louise Gray, Caoimhe Dempsey and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Laure Lu ChenCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5696-240X
Jean Anne HengCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8083-0930
Chengyi XuCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-8925
Michelle R EllefsonFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0407-9767
Miryam EdwardsCentre for Developmental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Hana D'SouzaSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Elian FinkSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0328-9685
Mikeda JessCentre for Developmental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Louise GrayCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Caoimhe DempseyCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mishika MehrotraCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Siu Ching WongCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Catherine WuCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Brittany HuangCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jiayin ZhengFaculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zhen WuDepartment of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3655-1069
Rory T DevineCentre for Developmental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-7878
Claire HughesCentre for Child, Adolescent and Family Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-3025

Funding

China International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship (Talent-Introduction Program)Economic and Social Research Council ES/T016175/1Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program 20235080047WEMP Foundation XJAG/099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-site comparisons indicate that East Asian children typically excel on tests of executive function (EF), but interpreting this contrast is made difficult by both the heavy reliance on testing in school settings and by the scarcity of studies that assess across-site measurement invariance. Addressing these gaps, our study included remote home-based assessments of EF for 1002 children (M

Indexed as

Child BehaviorExecutive FunctionSelf-ControlChildChild, PreschoolChinaEnglandFemaleHong KongHumansMaleadjustment problemscross‐cultural comparisonexecutive functiononline home‐based assessment

Identifiers

PMID40439458
PMCPMC12379854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.