ArticleChemical research in toxicology2025
Refining the Amino Reactivity-Based Identification of Respiratory Sensitizers.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precaution with standards: rethinking respiratory sensitization classification through the case of methyl methacrylate.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sensitization of the respiratory tract may lead to various pulmonary diseases such as asthma. It can be triggered by the chemical reaction of organic electrophiles with nucleophiles of lung proteins with amino groups being of particular interest in this case. For assessing the dermal sensitization potential of chemicals, the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) has become an OECD-accepted nonanimal test system. However, issues with the identification of known respiratory sensitizers such as isocyanates and anhydrides based on their amino reactivity in the DPRA have been reported. Hence, in this study the chemoassay employing glycine-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.