ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
An experimental test of the influence of microbial manipulation on sugar kelp (
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kelp are valued for a wide range of commercial products and their role in kelp forest ecosystems, making kelp cultivation a rapidly expanding economic sector. Microbes associated with kelp and other macroalgae play a critical role in processes such as nutrient exchange, chemical signaling, and defense against pathogens. Thus, manipulating the microbiome to enhance macroalgal growth and resilience is a promising yet underexplored approach for sustainable kelp cultivation. The core microbiome hypothesis suggests that the bacteria that are consistently found on a host (the core microbes) are likely to have a disproportionate impact on host biology, making them an attractive target for microbiome manipulation. In this study, we surveyed wild IMPORTANCE: Microorganisms consistently associated with hosts are widely thought to be more likely to impact host biology and health. However, this intuitive concept has not been experimentally evaluated. This study formalizes this concept as the Core Microbiome Influences Host Function hypothesis and experimentally tests this hypothesis in sugar kelp (Saccharina). The distribution of bacteria on wild kelp and core microbes was first identified by compiling a broad dataset of the kelp microbiome sampled across space and time. Bacterial cultures were isolated from the surface of sugar kelp and individually grown in laboratory co-culture with sugar kelp spores to assess the ability of bacterial isolates to influence kelp growth and development. In support of the core influences host function hypothesis, isolates belonging to bacterial genera that are more strongly associated with wild sugar kelp are more likely to influence development in laboratory experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.