Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439420›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025

An experimental test of the influence of microbial manipulation on sugar kelp (

Jungsoo Park, Evan Kohn, Siobhan Schenk, Katherine M Davis, Jennifer S Clark, Laura Wegener Parfrey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jungsoo Park *Department of Botany, Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3782-0566
Evan Kohn *Department of Botany, Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-8666-7990
Siobhan SchenkDepartment of Botany, Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0572-9303
Katherine M DavisDepartment of Botany, Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8494-7300
Jennifer S ClarkCascadia Seaweed Corporation, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0357-0688
Laura Wegener ParfreyDepartment of Botany, Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6959-7616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kelp are valued for a wide range of commercial products and their role in kelp forest ecosystems, making kelp cultivation a rapidly expanding economic sector. Microbes associated with kelp and other macroalgae play a critical role in processes such as nutrient exchange, chemical signaling, and defense against pathogens. Thus, manipulating the microbiome to enhance macroalgal growth and resilience is a promising yet underexplored approach for sustainable kelp cultivation. The core microbiome hypothesis suggests that the bacteria that are consistently found on a host (the core microbes) are likely to have a disproportionate impact on host biology, making them an attractive target for microbiome manipulation. In this study, we surveyed wild IMPORTANCE: Microorganisms consistently associated with hosts are widely thought to be more likely to impact host biology and health. However, this intuitive concept has not been experimentally evaluated. This study formalizes this concept as the Core Microbiome Influences Host Function hypothesis and experimentally tests this hypothesis in sugar kelp (Saccharina). The distribution of bacteria on wild kelp and core microbes was first identified by compiling a broad dataset of the kelp microbiome sampled across space and time. Bacterial cultures were isolated from the surface of sugar kelp and individually grown in laboratory co-culture with sugar kelp spores to assess the ability of bacterial isolates to influence kelp growth and development. In support of the core influences host function hypothesis, isolates belonging to bacterial genera that are more strongly associated with wild sugar kelp are more likely to influence development in laboratory experiments.

Indexed as

BacteriaKelpMicrobiotaEdible SeaweedsLaminariabacterial isolationcore microbiomekelp cultivationmicrobial ecologymicrobial manipulationSaccharina latissima

Identifiers

PMID40439420
PMCPMC12175540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.