ReviewHarvard review of psychiatry
Health Economic Perspective on Internet-Based Psychological Interventions for the Prevention and Management of Eating Disorders.
Review in Harvard review of psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInternet-based psychological interventions are becoming a feasible substitute for conventional in-person therapy. This article provides a perspective on health economic evaluations of internet-based interventions employed for preventing and managing eating disorders (EDs).
methodsA comprehensive search was undertaken from January 2000 to December 2023 across five general medical and three health economic databases. The goal was to identify complete economic evaluations of internet-based strategies for managing and preventing EDs.
resultsA total of seven economic evaluations were found, carried out across four countries. The studies utilized internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, Featback, and virtual Body Project groups as experimental interventions. The controls were either wait-list comparison groups or recipients of face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy. Among the seven studies evaluated, five indicated that internet-based interventions were more advantageous in terms of cost and clinical benefits based on both societal and health care perspectives. One study supported implementation of the internet-based intervention primarily based on cost, and one study's findings were inconclusive.
conclusionFrom both societal and health care perspectives, internet-based interventions offer significant benefits in terms of cost and clinical effectiveness. The current body of evidence, however, is limited by the small number of studies and methodological variations. It is also essential to understand that these intervention outcomes may be influenced by comparator choice and thresholds for willingness to pay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.