ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025
Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening in India: Insights from National Family Health Survey-5 Data.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer screening uptake and tobacco-alcohol use among women in Uttarakhand: A district-wise analysis from the 5th National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5).The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Cervical cytology screening in a newly established government medical college: A bethesda-based reporting analysis.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Decomposing Oral Cancer Screening Inequalities Across Wealth Index among Indian Women Aged 30-49 Years: Findings From National Family Health Survey-5.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer, one of the commonest malignancies, can be prevented and cured through early diagnosis. Screening plays an important role in its control strategy, and India has dedicated strategies to its implementation. However, screening uptake is low in India. We examined how sociocultural and financial factors affect Indian women's cervical cancer-screening uptake behaviour.
methodsCervical cancer screening-uptake and relevant social, cultural, and financial data obtained from round-5 of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) were used for analysis. We examined 399,039 eligible records to survey cervical cancer screening conduct and assessed the impact of sociocultural barriers on such conduct using logistic regression. Descriptive statistics were used to describe background data.
resultsMost participants, aged 30-34 years, were uneducated, homemakers with bank accounts; mobile phone usage was limited, particularly in rural areas. One-third possessed health insurance, and approximately 10% had pre-diagnosed comorbidities. Only 2% underwent cervical cancer screening. Screening uptake was higher among older, educated, employed individuals with bank accounts, phone access, and media exposure. Mothers with more children and perceived constraints against healthcare seeking had lower uptake rates. Tobacco use, insurance, wealth, and media access had contrasting effects in rural and urban settings.
conclusionSociocultural and monetary factors have an unmistakable influence on cervical cancer screening uptake. Thus, aside from the continuous strengthening of the health system, our findings call for targeted mediations against misguided judgments and taboos alongside financial and social empowerment for better outcomes in India's cancer-screening policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.