Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439379›Full record

Observational studyAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

The Predictive Model of Suboptimal Primary Debulking Surgery among Women with Ovarian Cancer Using Pre-Operative Computerized Tomography, Tumor Markers and Comparison with the Intraoperative Findings: An Experience in Tertiary Care Hospital of Pakistan.

Ayesha Saba, Muhammad Saqib Qamar Ishaqi, Muhammad Shadab Khan, Anita Manzoor, Shajeea Arshad Ali

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayesha SabaConsultant Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indus Hospital and Health Network (IHHN), Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8831-3973
Muhammad Saqib Qamar IshaqiConsultant and Head of department, Department of Radiology, IHHN, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0005-0513-2058
Muhammad Shadab KhanSurgical oncology, Sindh Insttitute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-2628
Anita ManzoorPostgraduate Trainee, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IHHN, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0001-8254-994X
Shajeea Arshad AliPostgraduate Trainee, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IHHN, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3212-6700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOvarian cancer is reported to be one of the most morbid gynecological cancers, often diagnosed at advanced stages. Primary debulking surgery (PDS) along with chemotherapy is the treatment of choice; however, there is a high probability of suboptimal excision. Thus, each patient should be evaluated for the appropriate treatment modality and PDS should be deferred as the risk of surgical complications and delay in chemotherapy consequently impacts survival. It is imperative to formulate a predictive model to select patients for optimal debulking surgery.

methodsA prospective observational study was conducted on women with ovarian cancer who underwent PDS at Indus Hospital and Health Network (IHHN), Pakistan from March 1st, 2020 till June 30th, 2024. Data was analyzed using SPSS 20.0. Chi-Square test was used to find the association between the predictors of optimal and sub-optimal debulking surgery using pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scan findings, and serum tumor markers. The sensitivity and specificity of serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) levels were measured.

resultsA total of 65 women with ovarian tumors were recruited in the study. Around 90.7% of patients had optimal PDS while 9.2% of patients underwent suboptimal PDS. Using pre-operative predictive scoring criteria, 48 (73.8%) patients scored 0-5 and all had optimal PDS while 11 (16.9%) patients scored 6-8, out of which 9 had suboptimal PDS (P value 0.00). A predictive score of 9 or more was reported in 6 (9.2%) patients, out of which 4 had suboptimal PDS.

conclusionThis study proposed a predictive model using pre-operative CT scan criteria and tumor marker serum CA-125 level which will help in scoring the patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Subsequent treatment options should be decided either in the form of upfront debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are required to formulate a better applicable predictive model in all types of ovarian cancer including germ-cell ovarian tumors and sex cord-stromal tumors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresOvarian NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedCA-125 AntigenFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPakistanPreoperative CarePrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-125CT scan findingsKeywords: ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID40439379
PMCPMC12290207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.