Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439294›Full record

ReviewTree physiology2025

Populus salicinoids: a thriving subfield in the omics era.

Noah J Kaufman, Jamie You, Brian G Fox, Shawn D Mansfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tree physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noah J KaufmanDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Science, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Jamie YouDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Science, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Brian G FoxDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 433 Babcock Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1544, USA.
Shawn D MansfieldDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Science, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0175-554X

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences #DE-SC0023013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the salicaceous genus Populus are primarily used by plant biologists as a model system for understanding the genetic underpinnings of woody plant growth and development. Beyond their importance to those conducting developmental research, Populus spp. are key members of ecosystems in the Northern Hemisphere and show promise as a vital renewable source of biomass for sustainable biofuel production. This genus also produces a class of signature herbivore-deterring and medicinally significant phenolic glycosides, commonly referred to as salicinoids. Although salicinoids in Populus are primarily associated with defense against biotic disturbances, they have also been implicated in structuring the chemotaxonomy of Populus and Salicaceae, shaping endophytic microbiomes, directing abiotic stress responses and participating in primary metabolism. Despite advancements in understanding these interactions through functional genomics and biotechnological techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9, much about their function and biosynthesis still remains obfuscated. Here, we summarize a global view of progress made in Populus salicinoid research, focusing particularly on studies conducted through a biotechnological lens, to elucidate the distribution, ecological significance, and biosynthesis of these compounds.

Indexed as

GlycosidesPopulusGenomicsGlycosideschemotaxonomyphenolic glycosidesplant defensepoplar herbivorySalicaceaesecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID40439294
PMCPMC12666384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.