ArticleJournal of paediatrics and child health2025
A Clinical Prediction Model to Assist Screening Patients for Scabies in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Clinical Prediction Model to Assist Screening Patients for Scabies in Primary Care.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo develop and test a clinical prediction model based on demography and symptoms to assist in screening for scabies diagnosis in primary care.
methodsData from a scabies prevalence survey conducted in Auckland, New Zealand (NZ) were analysed using logistic regression to predict diagnosis, defined by either clinical criteria (International Alliance for the Control of Scabies, IACS) or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for scabies derived from a skin swab. Best subsets regression was used to select predictors in the final models, using Akaike's information criterion. Model performance was assessed using internal validation with bootstrap resampling.
resultsFrom a survey of 181 children aged between 8 months and 14 years, 105 were available for analysis with complete questionnaires. Age and symptoms of itch (in the child and their close contacts) were retained as predictors of the model where clinical scabies diagnosis was the outcome. In addition to these predictors, whether household members were affected by insect bites, skin sores or blisters was also retained as a predictor of qPCR-based diagnosis. Accuracy was good for both models, with discrimination and calibration indices favourable (Harrell's concordance index 0.96 [IACS] and 0.85 [qPCR]; calibration slope 0.82 [IACS] and 0.77 [qPCR]).
conclusionSimple logistic models based on common symptoms of scabies, especially itch in the child and 'simultaneous itch in the family', accurately predict scabies status. Such tools have potential use in supporting screening and improving diagnosis of scabies in community and primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.