Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40439272›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Effective dispersal of fern spore and the ecological relevance of zoochory.

James M R Brock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James M R BrockUniversity of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5269-3051

Funding

Marsden Fund 24-UOA-027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms of fern dispersal are under-studied and there are few data to support the vectors assumed to drive patterns of sporophyte occurrence and speciation. Although wind is generally the fern spore dispersal vector described in the literature, there has always been competing evidence supporting alternate vectors. Despite this, established patterns of dispersal are generally discussed in the context of wind. The assumptions around wind as a dispersal vector and the possibilities of single-spore establishment have confounded discussions on effective dispersal of fern spore, fern meta-population dynamics, and fern speciation. In this study, I review (i) the importance of spore load across taxa, (ii) evidence for vectors of fern spore, (iii) the environmental tolerances of fern life stages, and (iv) the relevance of, and constraints on, different dispersal vectors in the context of increasingly hazardous landscape matrices. I conclude that whilst wind is an important dispersal vector in non-hazardous landscapes, directed dispersal by an animal vector to isolated safe sites in a hazardous landscape matrix may be key for fern metapopulations and communities.

Indexed as

FernsSeed DispersalSporesAnimalsEcosystemWindanimalbiogeographybirdislandisolationlandscape ecologymetapopulationpteridophytespeciationwind

Identifiers

PMID40439272
PMCPMC12407044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.