ArticleCancer medicine2025
Gene Expression Analysis of (Paired) Primary and Relapsed Wilms Tumor Samples to Unravel the Underlying Factors Driving Tumor Recurrence.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to unravel underlying factors driving Wilms tumor (WT) recurrence and to build a prediction model for recurrence based on gene expression data of (paired) primary and relapsed WT samples. EXPERIMENTAL
designGene expression levels from seven paired primary and relapsed WT samples from patients treated in the Princess Máxima Center were compared among each other, as well as to matched primary WT samples of patients without recurrence (controls). The differential gene expression analysis results were run through ToppGene for functional enrichment. We built a 10-fold ridge regression model to predict relapse based on gene expression levels of the seven primary cases and all other available primary WT controls (n = 42).
resultsThe comparison of primary WT and paired relapses showed downregulation of genes involved in immune regulation among relapses and upregulation of cancer stem cell (CSC) regulation genes. Comparing these primary WT samples to matched controls, we observed that downregulated genes in primary samples of relapsed patients were related to stromal cells and muscle development, and upregulated genes were associated with CSCs. The prediction model revealed a sensitivity of 57.14% (95% CI: 14.29%-85.71%) and a specificity of 92.86% (95% CI: 83.33%-100%) when predicting WT relapse.
conclusionThe CSC pool could play a role in relapse through immune regulation and tumor propagation. Differentiation of CSCs into mesenchymal cells might attenuate the risk of relapse. Our prediction model might aid in selecting patients with an increased risk of relapse at primary diagnosis when externally validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.