Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438994›Full record

ReviewBiology letters2025

The living dinosaur: accomplishments and challenges of reconstructing dinosaur physiology.

Stephanie L Baumgart, Clinton A Grand Pré, Jason M Bourke, Emma R Schachner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dinosaur science.Biology letters · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie L BaumgartDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9534-7389
Clinton A Grand PréDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-3823-8362
Jason M BourkeDepartment of Biomedical and Anatomical Sciences, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine at Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6966-8020
Emma R SchachnerDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8636-925X

Funding

University of Florida
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drive to determine the physiology of non-avian dinosaurs has produced several novel methodologies. In this review, we survey the current state of the field and evaluate the latest reconstructions of non-avian dinosaurian metabolism, thermoregulation, respiratory biology, and the cardiovascular and digestive systems. Most inferences of dinosaur physiology are based on correlations that assume tightly linked relationships between physiology and anatomy. Such causal links must first be well established, tested and functionally validated across a phylogenetically broad range of extant taxa before they can be applied to extinct forms. We offer some basic guidelines for conducting evidence-based, robust reconstructions of palaeophysiology that stay within the confines of both empirical studies and the fossil record.

Indexed as

DinosaursAnimalsBiological EvolutionBody Temperature RegulationFossilsPaleontologyPhylogenybiological correlatesDinosauriametabolismphysiologyrespirationthermoregulation

Identifiers

PMID40438994
PMCPMC12120690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.