ArticleJournal of Appalachian health2025
Determinants of Willingness to Share Wearable Health Data with Health Care Providers in Appalachian Populations: an Exploratory Study.
Article in Journal of Appalachian health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wearable health devices capture metrics (e.g., physical activity, ECG, sleep) that can enhance care when shared with providers. Yet, willingness to share wearable data may differ in Appalachia, where chronic disease burdens, mistrust, and limited infrastructure pose unique challenges. Objective: This study explored (1) which sociodemographic, health, and digital behaviors correlate with willingness to share wearable data and (2) how these insights can guide region-specific interventions in Appalachia. Methods: We analyzed 320 Appalachian respondents from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 6). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models examined willingness to share wearable data. Because of small cell counts, we supplemented with a Firth (penalized) logistic regression for robustness. Results: Approximately 25.0% unweighted (27.9% weighted) were willing to share wearable data, but two-thirds did not respond or were inapplicable. The final adjusted model (n=47) revealed:Income: Higher income correlated with increased willingness (e.g., aOR=8.52e+04 for $35-49k vs.Self-Rated Health: "Good" or "very good" health was associated with higher odds of sharing than "poor" health (aOR=4406.52; p<.05).Messaging: Surprisingly, participants who never messaged providers showed greater willingness (aOR=1.93e+07; p. Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that household income, perceived health, and digital behaviors influence wearable data-sharing in Appalachia, whereas national demographic trends may not apply. Future work should use larger samples, mixed methods, and region-specific approaches to address mistrust, privacy concerns, and infrastructural barriers, aiming to enhance remote patient monitoring and reduce health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.