ArticleCureus2025
The Manchester Charcot Ankle Neuroarthropathy (M-CAN) Classification: A Radiographic-Based System for Assessing Charcot Ankle Neuroarthropathy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Burning Issues/Hot Topics: The Charcot Foot.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) is a complication of long-standing, poorly controlled diabetes, associated with increased risks of amputation and mortality. Currently, there is no dedicated classification system specifically for ankle CN, nor a standardized description of the possible deformities involving the ankle in relation to CN. This study aims to develop and propose the Manchester Charcot Ankle Neuroarthropathy (M-CAN) classification - a descriptive, radiograph-based system designed to categorize ankle deformities and patterns of bone loss in patients with diabetic CN. The M-CAN classification may aid clinicians in early identification of deformities, facilitating more effective treatment planning and improved outcomes. Methods This retrospective review included 71 patients with diabetic ankle CN who were managed at the Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust over a 10-year period. Patterns of ankle deformity and bone loss were assessed using weight-bearing radiographs, and this information formed the basis for developing the classification system. The proposed classification is structured as follows: "A" refers to the alignment of the ankle joint - Type 1: varus ankle, Type 2: valgus ankle, Type 3: anterior angulation, Type 4: posterior angulation, Type 5: combined plane deformity, and Type N: neutral ankle. "B" denotes bone loss around the ankle joint - Subtype a: tibial bone loss, Subtype b: talar bone loss, Subtype c: calcaneal bone loss, and Subtype d: combined bone loss. "C" represents the cutaneous condition around the ankle, including ulceration and infection. "D" reflects diabetic control, measured by glycated hemoglobin levels. "E" captures the modified Eichenholtz stage of Charcot - Stages 0, 1, 2, and 3. "F" indicates foot perfusion status as assessed by Doppler studies. The classification primarily describes the deformity pattern "A", bone loss "B", and CN stage "E" using standard weight-bearing ankle radiographs, with optional supplementary information from the cutaneous condition "C", glycemic control "D", and pedal perfusion status "F". Results A total of 75 ankle X-rays from CN patients were reviewed. The coronal and sagittal planes of deformity "A" were assessed, and the patterns of bone loss "B" were documented, along with the Eichenholtz stage "E". Based on this A+B+E framework, the most common classification among patients was Type 1-d Stage 3, indicating a varus ankle with combined tibial, talar, and calcaneal bone loss in the consolidation stage of CN. Inter- and intra-observer agreement for components A and B showed near-perfect reliability, with a Kappa value of 0.94. Conclusions This new classification system for ankle CN facilitates the understanding of deformity patterns using plain radiographs and serves as a descriptive tool. It allows the condition to be categorized based on the specific deformities and associated osseous loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.