ArticleCureus2025
Unraveling Early Onset Disparities and Determinants: An Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Outcomes and Trends in Texas.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the Diagnostic Gap in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Red-Flag Symptoms, Screening, and Inherited Risk.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Molecular Profiling of JAK-STAT Pathway Alterations in FOLFOX-Treated Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study of Fruquintinib Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the U.S., with disparities in incidence, survival, and age at diagnosis across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. The rising incidence of early-onset CRC (<50 years) has amplified concerns regarding access to care, screening disparities, and outcomes, particularly among minorities. This study examines the impact of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and sex on CRC survival and age at diagnosis in Texas from 1995 to 2016. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilized Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) data, including 235,076 CRC cases diagnosed between 1995 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests assessed 10-year survival by race and ethnicity and time period (1995-2005 vs. 2006-2016). Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni correction were used to compare survival years between racial/ethnic groups within each period. Age at diagnosis was analyzed by race and ethnicity, and SES using Welch ANOVA and Games-Howell post hoc testing. Welch's t-tests compared intra-race changes across decades. Sex-based differences in diagnosis age were assessed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Significant racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities were observed in CRC outcomes. Black: Non-Hispanic and Black: Hispanic patients exhibited some of the lowest median survival times, with minimal overall improvement between the two time periods. Although Black: Hispanic patients exhibited the lowest median survival, the difference was not statistically significant in the 2006-2016 cohort (p = 0.12). Hispanic and Black patients were diagnosed at younger ages compared to White: Non-Hispanic patients. Lower SES was associated with younger age at diagnosis and worse survival. Male patients were consistently diagnosed earlier than female patients across both decades. Despite some improvement in survival for certain groups, disparities persisted, particularly for Black: Non-Hispanic and Black: Hispanic patients. Conclusion Disparities in CRC survival and diagnosis age persist across racial, ethnic, SES, and sex lines in Texas. These findings underscore the need for tailored screening efforts, improved healthcare access, and targeted interventions for high-risk populations. Persistent sex-based differences highlight a need for further research into biological and systemic factors. Addressing social determinants of health may help reduce these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.