ArticleCureus2025
Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey Study of Pain Management in Portuguese Pediatric Emergency Departments (2007-2018).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The prevalence of pediatric pain, either related to the child's hospital visit or because of diagnostic and/or therapeutical interventions, is of primordial importance in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). In this study, we evaluate the evolution of pain assessment and management in Portuguese PEDs over 11 years. Methods We prepared a questionnaire addressed to head physicians of 45 Portuguese PEDs in 2007 and statistically compared the responses to those provided in 2018, where we also posed these questions to nurse managers. Results Pain assessment in our cohort of Portuguese PEDs has significantly improved, namely, with the establishment of local protocols and widespread use of pain scales (from 52% to 93%, p = 0.03). However, effective adoption of pain management remains insufficient, as mild to moderate pain is still far from being universally treated (only 22% always use analgesia). Nonetheless, there seems to be adequate treatment of severe pain and respective common use of opioids, but correct practices were not generally adopted when specific types of pain were analyzed. Procedural sedation and analgesia have significantly increased but are not yet universally practiced. In the year 2018, about 88% of these inadequacies are reflected by the staff's perception that pain management remains suboptimal, and more training is needed. Conclusion The development of collective awareness and the institution of national guidelines for pediatric pain have helped to improve the conjuncture in Portuguese PEDs. However, a coordinated nationwide plan to promote local training and optimize knowledge translation is still lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.