ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Fatigue-Reducing Interventions in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Role of Hydro-Kinesiotherapy After Intra-Articular Steroid Infiltration in the Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Non-Randomized Observational Pre-Post Study with Parallel Groups.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are few intervention trials aimed at lowering fatigue in pediatric rheumatic conditions (PRCs), despite the fact that it is a common and upsetting symptom in these patients. The study's primary goal is to thoroughly examine the data pertaining to the effectiveness of treatments meant to lessen fatigue in PRC patients. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search for relevant studies across four different databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar). A total of 493 records were identified through database searches, and after removing 196 duplicates, 297 unique studies remained for screening. Following title screening and eligibility assessment, 45 studies were excluded for various reasons, and 10 studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The interventions included exercise treatment on land and in water, prednisolone, vitamin D and creatine supplements, psychological counseling, and a program for transitioning into a mature rheumatology program. Every included study measured fatigue using self-reported questionnaires. Two randomized controlled studies found land-based exercise treatment to be ineffective, while one pre-post intervention research found it to be useful. Compared to land-based exercise therapy, aquatic-based physical therapy was found to be more beneficial. Prednisolone combined with vitamin D significantly reduced subjective fatigue in two placebo-controlled trials. Creatine did not seem to be beneficial. The effectiveness of the present therapies to lessen fatigue in PRCs is not sufficiently supported by the available data. Future research should focus on intervention studies targeted at treating fatigue in adolescents and children with PRCs, as indicated by the small number of investigations, non-comparable therapies, risk of bias, and unclear outcomes of the included studies. It is necessary to identify potential underlying biological and psychological pathways as potential therapy targets in order to lessen fatigue symptoms in kids and teenagers with PRCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.