Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438823›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Blockchain for Securing AI-Driven Healthcare Systems: A Systematic Review and Future Research Perspectives.

Pratik Kasralikar, Omkar Reddy Polu, Balaiah Chamarthi, Rana Veer Samara Sihman Bharattej Rupavath, Sandipkumar Patel, Ramakrishna Tumati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: What's next?World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pratik KasralikarDepartment of Business Administration, Lindsey Wilson College, Kentucky, USA.
Omkar Reddy PoluDepartment of Technology and Innovation, City National Bank, Los Angeles, USA.
Balaiah ChamarthiDepartment of Technology and Innovation, Info Services LLC, Livonia, USA.
Rana Veer Samara Sihman Bharattej RupavathDepartment of Business Administration, National Louis University, Tampa, USA.
Sandipkumar PatelDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gujarat Technological University, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ramakrishna TumatiDepartment of Software Application and Engineering, Intel, Beaverton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of AI in healthcare has significantly advanced diagnostics, patient monitoring, and personalized treatments. However, the reliance on vast datasets raises critical concerns about data privacy, security, and trustworthiness. Blockchain technology, with its decentralized and immutable nature, has emerged as a promising solution to these challenges. This systematic review aims to explore the role of blockchain in securing AI-driven healthcare systems, evaluating its potential to enhance data security, privacy, and interoperability while identifying key challenges and future research directions. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, conducting a comprehensive search across databases such as IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Xplore Digital Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Inclusion criteria focused on peer-reviewed studies discussing blockchain and AI integration in healthcare, while exclusion criteria eliminated irrelevant or non-empirical studies. Data extraction captured study characteristics, AI algorithms, blockchain types, key findings, and limitations. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist, evaluating methodological rigor, innovation, and reproducibility. The review included 15 studies highlighting blockchain's role in securing AI-driven healthcare systems. Key findings demonstrated blockchain's effectiveness in enabling decentralized data sharing (e.g., federated learning (FL)), enhancing data integrity, and improving diagnostic accuracy. However, challenges such as scalability, interoperability, and regulatory compliance were recurrent. The quality assessment revealed moderate-to-high methodological quality but underscored gaps in reproducibility and real-world validation. Blockchain technology holds transformative potential for securing AI-driven healthcare systems by addressing critical privacy and security concerns. However, the field remains nascent, with significant hurdles in scalability, technical standardization, and ethical governance. Future research should prioritize hybrid blockchain architectures, clinical trials, and interdisciplinary collaboration to bridge these gaps and realize the full potential of blockchain-AI integration in healthcare.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)blockchaindata privacyfederated learninghealthcare security

Identifiers

PMID40438823
PMCPMC12118943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.