ArticleCureus2025
One-Year Results of Orthokeratology and Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segment Lenses in French Children for Myopia Control.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Which is better for myopia control in children: orthokeratology or DIMS spectacle lenses? A meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Defocus incorporated multiple segment spectacle lenses versus orthokeratology lenses for myopia control: a non-inferiority randomised clinical trial.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Myopia is a common refractive error affecting vision. This study aims to evaluate two real-world methods for myopia control: orthokeratology (ortho-k) and defocus incorporated multiple segment (DIMS) spectacles lenses. Methods This retrospective observational multicenter study was conducted on a French population with myopia, treated with either DIMS spectacle lenses or ortho-k for myopia control. Baseline axial length (AL) and spherical equivalent refraction (SER) were recorded, along with data at six and 12 months. AL change was used as the primary criterion for myopia control. Results We included 111 patients in the ortho-k group and 88 in the spectacle lenses group. The mean baseline AL was 24.46 mm in the spectacle lenses group and 25.05 mm in the ortho-k group. No significant difference in AL elongation was observed between the two groups at the six- and 12-month time points. At six months, SER change in the DIMS group was significantly lower than in the ortho-k group; however, this difference was not maintained at 12 months. The mean AL elongation at 12 months was 0.12 mm (n=162) in the ortho-K group vs. 0.16 mm in the DIMS group (n=70). Conclusion The study provides new real-world data on myopia control techniques in French children. Both techniques appear to yield similar results over a one-year period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.