ArticleF1000Research2025
E-learning success evaluation in Lebanon during wartime: An extension of Delone and McLean IS success model.
Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- E-learning success evaluation in Lebanon during wartime: An extension of Delone and McLean IS success model.F1000Research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the fast-paced digital world, e-learning has become the most convenient medium for higher education institutions to provide scalable education. It is used to provide a flexible educational process through the employment of new technologies. Due to the impact of the war on education in Lebanon during fall 2024-2025 and the suspension of traditional learning, e-learning adoption was the answer to the ministry of education and higher education call for learning continuity. Despite extensive research on e-learning systems, limited empirical evidence exists on factors affecting its success during wartime. This study aims to assesses this success in achieving learning outcomes within the context of higher education under war risks based on the Delone and McLean IS model [1]. Methods: A quantitative approach was employed using a structured questionnaire distributed to 429 students and academic staff within higher education institutions in Lebanon. Sampling and data analysis were conducted through structural equation modelling to test hypothesized relationships of the proposed model in SPSS 27.0 using the path analysis. Results: The goodness-of-fit measurement of the model represent the desirability and good fit of the model (SRMR = 0. 048). The Cronbach's α values varying between 0.765 and 0.944, and CR values varying between 0.753, and 0.954, were considered sufficiently error-free and demonstrated the model's internal consistency and the constructs' good reliability. The AVE values ranging from 0.509 to 0.808 were all valid, and their convergent validity was fulfilled. The HTMT and the confidence interval empirical criterions are met and constructs discriminant validity is certain. The R Conclusions: According to empirical results, findings reveal that war-perceived risk directly and indirectly affects all model dimensions. Service quality does not significantly affect the intention to use/use, or user satisfaction. Moreover, intention to use/use had no significant impact on the success of e-learning in terms of satisfying its users and attaining their expected learning outcomes. Thus, the war risks imposes the e-learning usage to achieve its outcomes as the only available solution for learning in such circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.