Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438676›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Exploration in association between vitamin D and cutaneous melanoma and explainable machine learning prediction.

Lingyi Li, Man Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lingyi LiOutpatient Department Office, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Man LuoDepartment of Oncology, Wuhan No.1 Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine association between vitamin D with melanoma and develop an explainable machine learning model. Methods: For this study, relevant data were downloaded from the CDC's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) program, for the three survey cycles 2011-2012, 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. Self-reported melanoma data, serum vitamin D levels, and other covariates were downloaded and analyzed. Analysis of variance in this study was performed using t-tests and chi-square tests, modelling was performed using logistic regression based on NHANES weights, and other risk factors were analyzed using forest plots. Ten machine learning models were compared and XGboost was selected for the melanoma prediction. Results: In this study, logistic regression analysis revealed a protective effect of higher vitamin D levels in melanoma, the ORs were much less than 1 for Q2 (OR=0.97, 95% CI (0.44, 0.98)), Q3 (OR=0.71, 95% CI (0.65, 0.92)), and Q4 (OR=0.32, 95% CI (0.55, 0.81)). Meanwhile, forest plot analysis showed that vitamin D, the number of sunburns in the past year, advanced age, Caucasian, education some college, single and unmarried, smoking, diabetes and hypertension, were all statistically significant. The OR was higher in men than in women, with Q4 values of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18-0.51) for men and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.15-0.45) for women. OR was higher in the senior patients than in the non-senior group, with Q4 (OR=0.53, 95% CI (0.23, 0.73)). An explainable XGBoost model had AUC 0.906, and in the model vitamin D had main contribution to the model. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study concluded that vitamin D decreases melanoma risk based on a larger sample and multi-covariate analysis. Female and young people received high protection from vitamin D in melanoma. XGBoost can accurately prediction the possibility of melanoma based on vitamin D.

Indexed as

agingcutaneous melanomamaleNHANESvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID40438676
PMCPMC12117584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.