Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438635›Full record

Trial reportNature and science of sleep2025

Implementation and Effects of an Online Intervention Designed to Promote Sleep During Early Infancy: A Randomized Trial.

Stephanie Anzman-Frasca, Juliana Goldsmith, Amanda B Hassinger, Jennifer S Savage, Vaishali Gupta

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05322174 (The Baby Care Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05322174 nacompletednot on this map

The Baby Care Study: Online Support for New Parents

TypeinterventionalSponsorState University of New York at BuffaloRan2022 to 2023Enrolled74ConditionsSleep, Parenting, Eating Behavior, ObesityArmsBaby Sleep, Baby Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie Anzman-FrascaDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3111-4011
Juliana GoldsmithDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Amanda B HassingerDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jennifer S SavageCenter for Childhood Obesity Research, Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Vaishali GuptaDepartment of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Division of Behavioral Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Examine the implementation and effects of an interactive online intervention designed to support new parents with their young infants' sleep. Design: First-time parents were enrolled when infants were ~6 weeks old and randomized to a sleep intervention or general baby care control group, with intervention content provided weekly between infant ages 2 to 4 months, primarily as brief videos and infographics in private online groups. Methods: Parents (n=74) completed online surveys at baseline (infant age ~6 weeks), midpoint (3 months), post-intervention (4 months), and follow-up (7 months), reporting on infant sleep duration and night wakings (via Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire), as well as their own sleep duration (via Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and parenting satisfaction and self-efficacy (via Perceived Sense of Competence Scale). Marginal models examined sleep intervention effects on infants' total and nightly sleep duration and night wakings, parent sleep duration, and parenting satisfaction and self-efficacy over time. Results: Eighty-one percent of parents joined the online groups. There was a group-by-time interaction predicting total infant sleep duration, with total sleep increasing in the intervention group relative to controls. Tests of least squares means showed that intervention group infants slept 1.4 hours longer than controls at age 4 months (p=0.004). There were no significant effects on infants' nighttime sleep, but daytime napping increased in the intervention group relative to controls (p=0.04). Group differences in parent sleep were not statistically significant but were in a consistent direction when compared with intervention impacts on infant sleep. Parenting satisfaction increased significantly in both groups. Conclusion: Findings demonstrate the potential of an interactive online sleep intervention to support first-time parents with early infant sleep. Parent perspectives support acceptability of the approach and highlight the potential for further development of this scalable online intervention and examination of its impacts on additional aspects of well-being. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered prior to participant enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05322174). URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05322174.

Indexed as

infancyinterventiononlinesleep

Identifiers

PMID40438635
PMCPMC12118573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.