Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438633›Full record

ArticleProduction engineering : research and development2025

Methodology for the knowledge-based selection of occupational exoskeletons.

Tobias Drees, Lennart Ralfs, Benjamin Reimeir, Kai Lemmerz, Robert Weidner, Bernd Kuhlenkötter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Production engineering : research and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tobias DreesChair of Production Systems (LPS), Ruhr-University Bochum, Industriestraße 38c, 44894 Bochum, Germany.
Lennart RalfsChair of Production Technology, Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 13, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Benjamin ReimeirChair of Production Technology, Institute of Mechatronics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstraße 13, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Kai LemmerzRIF Institut für Forschung und Transfer e.V., Joseph-von-Fraunhofer Straße 20, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Robert WeidnerChair for Automated and Autonomous Systems (AAS), TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Akademiestraße 6, 09599 Freiberg, Germany.
Bernd KuhlenkötterChair of Production Systems (LPS), Ruhr-University Bochum, Industriestraße 38c, 44894 Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational exoskeletons for industrial workplaces hold significant promise for improving worker ergonomics and safety. However, the successful selection of an exoskeleton depends on informed decision-making processes that consider various factors ranging from biomechanical performance to usability and compatibility with work tasks. This paper presents a methodology that aims to develop a co-simulation-based selection tool for selecting an exoskeleton for specific industrial work tasks. It integrates multidisciplinary knowledge from biomechanics, human factors engineering, and industrial ergonomics for assessing the suitability of exoskeletons across diverse industrial applications. The methodology is designed as a stage-gate process with five main stages corresponding to the product development process. It describes the main tasks in each phase, their results, and the gates between the stages. The tasks and results are derived and detailed from the current literature and preliminary work. The gates include the specification of the simulation and decision-relevant input and output parameters, the design of the co-simulation model consisting of task and biomechanical simulation, the weighting of the individual decision criteria, and the subsequent implementation of the multi-criteria decision analysis to create a ranking of suitable exoskeletons. This work concludes by elaborating on the impact of the novel co-simulation methodology on research and industry. Research implications include advanced simulation methods for exoskeleton evaluation, the systematic comparison of different exoskeletons, and the development of decision analysis models. Benefits to the industry include improved compatibility, informed selection processes, reduced investment risks, and increased technology adoption.

Indexed as

Co-simulation modelHuman–robot-collaborationKnowledge-based selectionMethodology designMulticriterial evaluationOccupational exoskeletons

Identifiers

PMID40438633
PMCPMC12118543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.