ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Addressing social responsibility of kidney healthcare facilities in Africa.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Updates in the management of intradialytic hypotension: Emerging strategies and innovations.World journal of nephrology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social responsibility (SR) in health is of paramount importance in the development of health systems. It is, therefore, frequently presented as one of the solutions for healthcare improvement in most developed countries. In addition, SR in health has been the subject of several publications in the West and Asia. However, the absence of African data on this subject motivated us to carry out this study which aimed to assess SR of African public hospitals in terms of kidney disease management, and to explore the factors that influence it based on the perceptions of patients and nephrologists, and to suggest concrete solutions to improve it. Material and methods: Our study included participants, nephrologists and patients, of public hospitals in ten African countries. Two structured questionnaires were developed to measure the perception of patients and nephrologists regarding the hospital's performance based on four dimensions: Quality of service, pertinence of care, accessibility and professional ethics. Statistical analysis of the survey data included the Student's Results: Only 26.95% of the included patients believed that their hospitals were socially responsible. In fact, the general conditions of the hospitals and the accessibility of care (waiting times, overall cost, unavailability of treatments) were generally perceived to be unsatisfactory. Also, patients generally believed that receiving treatment regardless of their ability to pay was not always possible.As for doctors, 60% of the participants considered their hospitals not socially responsible. They had raised, in addition to the social determinants of health, a number of factors hindering SR of African hospitals, such as the lack of health professionals and brain drain.Finally, nephrologists suggested solutions, mainly directed at hospital managers, encompassing the following three components: Recruitment and training of human resources, leadership and governance, as well as strengthening of infrastructures and logistics. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the crucial role of hospital governance and stakeholder involvement in improving SR and care delivery. Participants' perceptions and concerns inform health authorities about managing kidney disease in African hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.