ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Complications associated with intestinal infusion therapies in patients with Parkinson's disease: a single-center retrospective study and 15-year experience.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Continuous infusion therapy after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: indications, outcomes, and patient selection.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- When caution becomes neglect: Deep brain stimulation and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Response to Levodopa-Entacapone-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study over a 4-Year Period.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, in advanced stages characterized by motor and non-motor fluctuations, significantly impacting patients' quality of life (QoL). Advanced therapies, such as levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel or carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (LCIG/CLES) and levodopa/entacapone/carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG), offer continuous levodopa administration to reduce fluctuations and improve QoL. However, these therapies require invasive percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J), which can lead to complications. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of complications related to gastrojejunostomy in patients treated with LCIG/CLES or LECIG and their impact on therapy outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included PD patients treated with LCIG/CLES or LECIG at our center over 15 years. Patients were included if they had a PEG-J inserted and had been on LCIG/CLES or LECIG for at least 3 months. Complications were analyzed to identify trends and practical solutions for management. Results: Of 111 PEG-J insertions, we analyzed 106 patients treated with LCIG/CLES or LECIG. A total of 77.4% experienced at least one adverse event (AE), predominantly device-related (69.8%). Common complications included knotting (24.4%), disconnection (22.8%), and occlusion (17.1%) of the inner tube. Serious AEs were rare but included three deaths within 30 days post-procedure, severe skin phlegmon in two patients, and severe gastrointestinal discomfort in one patient. The duration of PEG-J significantly correlated with AEs. Conclusion: Gastrojejunostomy-related AEs in LCIG/CLES and LECIG therapies are common but generally manageable with proper intervention. Serious complications are rare, with less than 10% discontinuing treatment due to dissatisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.