ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Implementation and Strategy in Developmental Care Practice in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease in Intensive Care Unit: Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gamification-Based Interventions for Treatment Adherence and Self-Management in Pediatric Chronic Diseases: A Scoping Review with Implications for Thalassemia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Early cardiac rehabilitation in ICU for infants after complex congenital heart disease surgery: a retrospective case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) is a common congenital heart defect in infants. This condition has a higher risk of developmental disorders. The majority of infants with CHD require long-term care in intensive care units, but infants only focus on getting medical care so that developmental care is rarely practiced. This review aims to determine the implementation and strategies in the practice of developmental care for infants with CHD in intensive care units. The study design used a scoping review with a literature search using five primary databases including Scopus, PubMed, Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, and Taylor & Francis. The inclusion criteria were English-language articles, articles with experimental research types, and participants of infant patients with CHD that discussed the effectiveness of implementing developmental care interventions and their implementation strategies. Based on the search results, we analyzed 13 relevant articles. There are several developmental care interventions for infants with CHD that we classified into physiological subsystems (massage therapy, Kangaroo Care (KC), exclusive breastfeeding, and nutritional care); cognitive, motor, and sensory subsystems (early physical therapy, tummy time, oral feeding, and physiotherapy); parent-infant interaction subsystems (Skin-to-Skin Contact (SSC), nutritional risk management, and nutritional training and support); and environmental management subsystems (infant accompaniment). The strategies in implementing the intervention include aspects of health workers (experience, training, and licensing); aspects of intervention protocols; and aspects of intervention methods and models (socialization, strict supervision, and the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model). The implementation and strategies of developmental care practices have been proven to improve development in infants with CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.