ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Defining Reablement in the Dutch Context: A Modified Delphi Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07772739 (Collaborative Reablement Service Model Implementation in Community-Based Settings), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Collaborative Reablement Service Model Implementation in Community-Based Settings
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community stakeholders' perspectives on supporting the well-being of older adults: a focus group study on lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Mapping of Reablement Research - A Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For the past decade, the Netherlands has been developing and implementing reablement programs to promote independence and to empower older adults' autonomy. However, a key challenge remains the lack of clarity around the definition of reablement and its relations to usual care practices. Existing international definitions lack specificity to account for contextual differences, such as variations in healthcare systems and cultural norms. An operational definition is needed that not only fits the Dutch health and social care system and incorporates context-specific elements. This study extends the original conceptual definition by integrating these elements, offering clearer, more practical guidance for real-world application. Materials and methods: A modified Delphi study was performed to develop a definition of reablement that fits the Dutch health and social care system, extending beyond conceptual understanding. The study comprised three expert rounds and three Delphi survey rounds. Results: A total of 139 participants from Dutch health and social care, education, research, and representatives of clients and informal caregivers, participated. They evaluated statements in four sections: the target group, aims, type of care or support, and characteristics of reablement programs. Key discussions during the expert rounds focused mainly on 1) the target group, emphasizing the importance of involving individuals and their families, and 2) the characteristics of reablement, such as coordinating roles, team composition, and size. Input from the Delphi surveys and expert rounds led to the development of an operational definition for the Dutch context, agreed upon by 81% of stakeholders. Conclusion: The Delphi methodology proved valuable in identifying context-specific elements and incorporating expert perspectives, creating a culturally and contextually sensitive definition. This definition distinguishes itself from the international version by offering practical guidance on areas of application and interventions, with a focus on promoting social participation, well-being, and the involvement of the individual's social network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.