Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438551›Full record

ArticleAdvances in laboratory medicine2025

Use of artificial intelligence to assess genetic predisposition to develop critical COVID-19 disease: a comparative study of machine learning models.

Salomón Martín Pérez, Flora Sanchez Jimenez, Sandra Fuentes Cantero, Marta Jímenez Barragan, Catalina Sanchez Mora, Juan M Borreguero Leon, Arrobas Velilla Teresa, Agustín Valido Morales, Juan A Delgado Torralbo, Antonio León Justel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salomón Martín PérezService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2086-3597
Flora Sanchez JimenezService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Sandra Fuentes CanteroDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Chemistry Rio Tinto General Hospital Huelva, Huelva, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4125-8625
Marta Jímenez BarraganService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Catalina Sanchez MoraService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Juan M Borreguero LeonService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Arrobas Velilla TeresaService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Agustín Valido MoralesUnit of Pulmonology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Juan A Delgado TorralboUnit of Pulmonology, Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.
Antonio León JustelService of Clinical Biochemistry Virgen Macarena University Hospital Seville, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Early prediction of critical COVID-19 disease is crucial for an optimal clinical management. The objective of this study was to optimize predictive models for critical COVID-19 disease. Clinical data, laboratory data and genetic polymorphisms were integrated into AI models to compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms. Methods: Data from 155 inpatients were analyzed, 23 of whom developed critical disease. A univariate analysis was performed to assess potential correlations between seven SNPs, nine clinical variables and 10 laboratory parameters at admission. Results: Of the 7 SNPs, only three SNPs demonstrated a significant association with critical disase, namely: rs77534576, rs10774671 and rs10490770. The ensemble models exhibited the best performance: Random Forest (AUC=0.989), XGBoost (AUC=0.954) and AdaBoost (AUC=0.927). Variable importance varied across models, with age, C-reactive protein, heart diseases and the three SNPs being the most influential features. The predictive power of models improved with the integration of the three SNPs, as compared to previous studies where genetic data were not included. Internal validation confirmed the superiority and stability of the ensemble models. Conclusions: Machine learning models may help predict progression into critical COVID-19-disease. The predictive power of models improves when SNPs associated with COVID-19 severity are integrated with laboratory and clinical data. Prior to implementation in clinical practice, larger studies in different populations are needed to validate and support the generalization of these results.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCOVID-19critical diseasegenetic polymorphisms (SNPs)logistic regressionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40438551
PMCPMC12107411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.