ArticleInfection and drug resistance2025
Using Machine Learning to Predict Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia.
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Using artificial intelligence and machine learning to predict linezolid-induced thrombocytopenia helps identify related risk factors in patients. Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2023, 284 patients receiving linezolid from Beijing Chaoyang Hospital were enrolled. The data underwent filtering to ensure completeness and quality. The filtered data were then randomly divided into training and validation sets at a 3:1 ratio using stratified sampling. Four machine learning methods-logistic regression, Lasso regression, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest-were employed to develop predictive models on the training set, with optimal hyperparameters determined through grid search. Model performance was assessed via 10 - fold cross - validation on the training set, and the model with the highest AUC was selected. The chosen model was further validated on the independent validation set, with AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) calculated. Results: During treatment with linezolid, 42 (14.8%) of the 284 patients developed thrombocytopenia, with an average onset of 12.0±5.6 days after starting linezolid therapy. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance, with an AUC of 0.902 (95% CI 0.814-0.991) in the validation set. This model achieved a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity of 86.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.4%. Conclusion: We developed a machine learning model to predict linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia, with the random forest model achieving an AUC of 0.902. This model can help clinicians assess patient risk and optimize treatment plans. Future work should validate the model in multicenter studies and explore its integration into clinical decision support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.