ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2025
Using half-hitch knots to uncouple surgical knot security and loop tautness.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most surgeons tie half-hitch knots, but many are unfamiliar with the principles underlying their security leading to insecure knots. When presented with evidence regarding tying technique and knot security, we note a proclivity among surgeons towards resistance to change with rationalizations such as concerns regarding tissue strangulation with increasing knot security. We hypothesize that this concern is unfounded. The aim of this study was to identify whether the impact of loop tautness on knot security is mediated through the configuration of the knot. Methods: Six-throw knots were tied with 0 silk. The loop of the knot encompassed two brass rings and a piece of latex hose. Four knot types were tied and tested: non-taut and taut single post knots (SxSxSxSxSxS in Dinsmore notation), and non-taut and taut alternating post knots (SxSxS#S#S#S in Dinsmore notation). The latex hose was then removed from the loop and the brass rings were distracted on a tensiometer to assess knot security. The main outcome for the study was knot security, including maximum force resisted by each knot type to 1 and 2 mm slippage and ultimate failure defined by slippage to unraveling or breakage of the suture. Differences of means were tested with 2-sided Results: By 1 mm slippage, the tautly tied alternating post knots were more secure than the single post knots, and the non-taut single post knots were less secure than all other configurations. By 2 mm slippage, the tautly tied alternating post knots were more secure than all other configurations and the non-taut alternating post knots were more secure than the tautly tied and non-taut single post knots. By ultimate failure, the tautly tied and non-taut alternating post knots were comparable and both more secure than both single post knots. Conclusions: Surgeons can utilize single and alternating post throws to independently confer knot security and loop tautness and thereby tie the knot needed under a given set of circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.