ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Knowledge map of artificial intelligence in neurodegenerative diseases: a decade-long bibliometric and visualization study.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Advanced AI Frameworks for Dual PPAR α/γ Agonist Discovery in Alzheimer's Disease.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Effects of Kongsheng Zhenzhong Pills on Neuroinflammation and cGAS-STING Pathway Activity in BV-2 Microglia.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- AI-driven insights into protein misfolding and innate immunity in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the incidence of neurodegenerative diseases increases, the related AI research is getting more and more advanced. In this study, we analyze the literature in this field over the last decade through bibliometric and visualization methods with the aim of mining the prominent journals, institutions, authors, and countries in this field and analyzing the keywords in order to speculate on possible future research trends. Methods: Our study extracted 1,921 relevant publications spanning 2015-2025 from the Web of Science Core Collection database. We conducted comprehensive bibliometric analyses and knowledge mapping visualizations using established scientometric tools: CiteSpace and Bibliometrix. Results: A total of 1921 documents were included in the study, the number of publications in this field showed an overall increasing trend, and the average number of citations showed a downward trend since 2019. Among the journals, Conclusion: Based on the relationship between keywords and time, we speculate that there are four possible research trends: 1. Precision diagnosis with multimodal data fusion. 2. Pathological mechanism analysis and target discovery. 3. Interpretable AI and clinical translation. 4. Technology differentiation for subdivided diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.