ArticleThe EPMA journal2025
Acute mountain sickness prediction: a concerto of multidimensional phenotypic data and machine learning strategies in the framework of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.
Article in The EPMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of acute mountain sickness occurring at 4554 m using overnight pulse oximetry from lower altitude: A pilot study.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and potential subtypes of acute mountain sickness: A state-of-the-science review.Redox biology · 2026Review
- Clustering analysis of acute mountain sickness susceptibility among young adults during rapid ascent using low-altitude step test data.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- High-altitude de-acclimatization and long-term immune suppression: the role of Nrf2 in Treg function targeting 3PM.The EPMA journal · 2026Article
- Integrated proteomic and metabolomic analyses define the molecular architecture of acute mountain sickness.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Integrative multi-omics analysis reveals inflammation-related molecular networks in acute mountain sickness.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Precision nutrition in sports science: an opinion on omics-based personalization and athletic outcomes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Physiological and molecular mechanisms of tolerance to hypoxia and oxygen deficiency resistance markers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a self-limiting illness, involving a complex series of physiological responses to rapid ascent to high altitudes, where the body is exposed to lower oxygen levels (hypoxia) and changes in atmospheric pressure. AMS is the mildest and most common form of altitude sickness; however, without adequate preparation and adherence to ascent guidelines, it can progress to life-threatening conditions. Aims: Due to the multi-factorial predisposition of AMS among individuals, identifying AMS biomarkers before high altitude exposure from multiple dimensions (e.g., clinical, metabolic, and proteomic markers) and integrating them to build an AMS predictive model enables early diagnosis and personalized interventions, which allows targeted allocation of medical resources, such as prophylactic medications (e.g., acetazolamide) and supplemental oxygen, to those who need them most and prevention of unnecessary complications. Consequently, predicting AMS utilizing biomarkers from multidimensional phenotypic data before high-altitude exposure is essential for the paradigm change in high-altitude medical research from currently applied reactive services to the cost-effective predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM) in primary (reversible damage to health and targeted protection against health-to-disease transition) and secondary (personalized protection against disease progression) care. Methods: To this end, this study recruited 83 Han Chinese male volunteers and obtained clinical, proteomic, and metabolomic profiles for analysis before they ascended to high altitudes. The Mann-Whitney Results: Among 83 participants, 66 were selected for detailed analysis after quality control steps. Six protein-metabolite co-expression modules were identified as significantly associated with AMS. The MI-radialSVM-RFE model selected 12 biomarkers (two clinical features: systolic blood pressure (SBP) and peak expiratory flow (PEF); six proteins: Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4), immunoglobulin kappa variable 1D-16 (IGKV1D-16), coagulation factor XIII B subunit (F13B), prosaposin (PSAP), poliovirus receptor (PVR), and multimerin-2 (MMRN2); and four metabolites: 2-Methyl-1,3-cyclohexadiene, calcitriol, 4-Acetamido-2-amino-6-nitrotoluene, and 20-Hydroxy-PGE2) for the AMS prediction model. The model exhibited excellent predictive performance in both training ( Conclusion and expert recommendations: This study advances high-altitude medicine by developing a predictive model for AMS using clinical, proteomic, and metabolomic data. The identified biomarkers linked to energy metabolism, immune response, and vascular regulation offer insights into AMS mechanisms. High-altitude predictive approaches should focus on implementing biomarker-driven risk screening using clinical, proteomic, and metabolomic data to identify high-risk individuals before high-altitude exposure. Preventive measures should prioritize pre-acclimatization protocols, tailored nutritional strategies and interventions guided by biomarker profiles, and lifestyle adjustments, such as maintaining mitochondrial health through proper nutritional strategies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-025-00404-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.