Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438377›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

The experience of immersive virtual reality in patients with heart failure during cardiac rehabilitation: a qualitative study.

Valentina Micheluzzi, Gavino Casu, Francesco Burrai, Antonella Canu, Antonio Sircana, Pierluigi Merella, Angelo Laconi, Andrea Chelo, Piero Cozzula, Michela Piredda and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Valentina Micheluzzi *Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Gavino Casu *Clinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Francesco BurraiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Antonella CanuClinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Antonio SircanaClinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Pierluigi MerellaClinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Angelo LaconiClinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Andrea CheloClinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Piero CozzulaClinical and Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Michela PireddaResearch Unit of Nursing Science, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico of Rome University, Rome, Italy.
Ercole VelloneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To alleviate symptoms and reduce adverse outcomes associated with heart failure, international guidelines strongly recommend cardiac rehabilitation. However, patient adherence to rehabilitation programs remains suboptimal, leading to unfavorable effects on key cardiac outcomes. Immersive virtual reality (iVR) is a promising intervention to improve adherence to cardiac rehabilitation and enhance clinical outcomes. This study aims to explore patients' experiences with iVR during cardiac rehabilitation. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was embedded within a randomized controlled two-arm trial involving twenty-two patients who were referred to undergo eight cardiac rehabilitation sessions, held twice a week for 30 min each. The intervention group experienced iVR in natural settings, while the control group received standard care. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted in person after the intervention group's eighth rehabilitation session. These interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using content analysis. Results: Data from twenty-two interviews reached saturation. Content analysis generated four main categories and nine subcategories: (1) cognitive and emotional benefits of iVR (acceptability and enrichment of the rehabilitation experience, positive emotions, cognitive engagement); (2) impact on rehabilitation (physical engagement, perceived effort); (3) customizable intervention (variety of scenarios, quality and beauty of the videos); (4) negative aspects of the iVR (discomfort with the equipment, negative feelings toward the iVR devices). Conclusion: IVR is an innovative and customizable intervention that enhances the rehabilitation experience by providing cognitive, emotional, and physical benefits. It improves key aspects of rehabilitation, including time perception, motivation, enjoyment, effort perception, and anxiety management, highlighting its potential in cardiac rehabilitation. However, certain technological challenges, such as discomfort with the equipment, must be addressed to optimize the user experience.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitationcontent analysisheart failureinterviewsqualitative researchvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40438377
PMCPMC12116676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.