Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438369›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Simulation-based infection prevention and control training for medical and healthcare students: a systematic review.

Akira Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki Ohtsuka, Keiichiro Aoki, Naonori Tashiro, Shusuke Togo, Kazuki Komaba, Satoshi Nogawa, Miwa Osawa, Megumi Enokida

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Akira YoshikawaDivision of Morphology, Anatomy and Physiology, Department of Medical Basics, Specialty and Education, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Hiroyuki OhtsukaDivision of Neurological Science, Department of Rehabilitation, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Keiichiro AokiDivision of Occupational Therapy and Mental Health, Department of Rehabilitation, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Naonori TashiroDivision of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Shusuke TogoDivision of Healthcare Management, Department of Medical Basics, Specialty and Education, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuki KomabaDivision of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Department of Rehabilitation, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Satoshi NogawaDivision of Clinical Engineering, Department of Medical Technology, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Miwa OsawaDivision of Clinical Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Megumi EnokidaDivision of Health Science Education, Department of Medical Basics, Specialty and Education, Showa Medical University, Graduate School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Infection prevention and control education has traditionally been conducted in a lecture-based manner, and simulation-based educational strategies have become increasingly prevalent in the field of medical education in recent years. This systematic review aimed to compare the effectiveness of the simulation-based and traditional strategies of infection prevention and control education and to show the differences between these educational approaches. Furthermore, we identified the characteristics of simulation-based strategies for infection prevention and control education. Method: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted using the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases for articles published between January 1990 and September 2022. This study focused on students enrolled in medical and health professional courses. As such, healthcare professionals already working in clinical settings, as well as kindergarten and elementary school students were excluded from the study. The quality of the included studies and the risk of bias in each study were assessed. A total of 254 articles were identified; 21 underwent secondary screening. Ultimately, 10 articles were selected for the final review. Results: Educational strategies between simulation- and lecture-based education showed improvements in knowledge acquisition. There was no significant difference in the rate of improvement between the two educational strategies. The characteristics of simulation-based educational strategies included confidence in skill performance, decision-making and problem-solving skills, emotional aspects related to infectious diseases (such as fear, empathy, self-reflection, and integration of complex information), and student satisfaction. Conclusion: This systematic review suggests that simulation-based education is effective in developing students' skills and attitudes, while traditional lecture-based methods are more suited for reinforcing students' knowledge. Therefore, it is essential to choose educational strategies based on specific learning objectives and outcomes. Systematic review registration: This systematic review protocol was preregistered in the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/uj623/.

Indexed as

infection controlinfection educationinfection preventionsimulation educationstudentssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40438369
PMCPMC12116496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.