Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438342›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment2025

Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Adversity Appraisal Questionnaire (AAQ).

Jane Jiyoun Lee, Gabrielle Lowenthal, Yo Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jane Jiyoun LeeChild Maltreatment Solutions Network, Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, 202 Henderson Building, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
Gabrielle LowenthalDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
Yo JacksonDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 140 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802 USA.

Funding

Trauma exposure, emotion regulation and cognitive skills in early childhood: Prospective and longitudinal examination of the mechanisms of adjustmentR01MH079252 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI JACKSON, YO · 2009 to 2021
$5.2M
Creating the Next Generation of Scholars in CM Science (CMT32)T32HD101390 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Erika Lunkenheimer, Hannah Milena Caroline Schreier · 2020 to 2026
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD101390NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH079252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appraisal refers to a cognitive process through which individuals perceive and interpret a given event. This study evaluated the factorial structure of the 22-item Adversity Appraisal Questionnaire (AAQ) developed to assess the appraisal styles of an adversity exposed, community sample in response to their experiences with potentially stressful life events. Given that current assessment tools for appraisal are limited by scope and range of appraisal elements, the AAQ was developed as an amalgam of all currently available appraisal measures and includes questions about how adults think and feel about potentially adverse events in their lives. The measure also asks why a given event was or was not impactful or important for the respondent. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) reliably identified a three-factor solution indicating three broad dimensions of appraisal: Emotional Distress, Perceived Controllability, and Perceived Threat. Internal consistency estimates for subscales were evaluated using Cronbach's α (Emotional Distress: α = 0.94, Perceived Controllability: α = 0.79, Perceived Threat: α = 0.75). Findings suggested that the AAQ is a psychometrically reliable instrument for assessing adults' appraisal styles and may be useful in studies requiring a comprehensive measurement of adversity appraisal. To document how the new three appraisal factors might be related to other important mental health cognitive processes, the study also examined the relation to hostile attribution biases as an example. The findings indicated that emotional distress appraisals are associated with hostile attribution biases. Recommendations for future research are provided.

Indexed as

AdversityAppraisalFactor analysisHostile attribution biasTrauma

Identifiers

PMID40438342
PMCPMC12106478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.