ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
An ethical framework for human genomic enhancement in China.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human genomic enhancement, or HGE, which improves human traits by introducing genetic and epigenetic changes, has garnered a lot of attention in light of the astounding advancement in genome editing techniques, such as CRISPR-Cas9, in recent years. This study combines doctrinal and empirical analysis methods to examine bioethical issues of HGE in China. The literature currently in publication on these issues indicates that the majority of Chinese academics and the general public are enthusiastic about the present and potential future applications of genome editing techniques within the parameters of appropriate ethical guidelines; regrettably, no workable ethical governance framework has been put forth so far. Considering this, this study offers a more comprehensive discussion of ethical policy on HGE and develops a robust ethical framework that addresses three related issues about HGE: (1) approaching the precautionary principle as an overarching benchmark; (2) producing a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance model to promote stakeholder engagement and dialogue; and (3) establishing regional ethics review centers to have an independent review process. This is done in an effort to address ethical concerns and further inform policymaking on HGE in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.