ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2025
Validation of a Combined Prognostic Score Using Plasma Tumor DNA and Clinical Features in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Taxanes.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: There is an urgent need of biomarkers to personalize metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment. A new prognostic model described by our group combines molecular characteristics (ptDNA levels), metabolic features from PET-scans (metabolic tumor volume), clinical parameters (visceral metastases), and lab tests (lactate-dehydrogenase levels) in abiraterone or enzalutamide-treated patients. This study aims to validate the score on mCRPC patients undergoing taxane treatment. Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients affected by mCRPC, pre-treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, candidate for taxane-based treatments, have been prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a basal PET/CT scan with F-choline and blood samples. The prognostic model previously described was applied to this population; based on the partial results of the parameters, we assigned the patients into three risk groups. Results: In the 28 patients evaluated, we observed a different median OS among the three risk groups (risk group I, 18.1 months [95% CI: 15.2-33.1 months]; risk group II, 12.7 months [4.9-18.6 months]; and risk group III, 10.1 months [3.4-15.4 months]; p = 0.012). Statistically significant differences were also observed for PFS. Conclusion: The prognostic score has confirmed to be a good prognostic tool also in a more advanced cohort of patients treated with taxanes. This tool may represent a valid method to refine prognostication and treatment selection in a cohort of patients where biomarkers are scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.