Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438313›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2025

Validation of a Combined Prognostic Score Using Plasma Tumor DNA and Clinical Features in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Taxanes.

Nicole Brighi, Giuseppe Schepisi, Vincenza Conteduca, Emanuela Scarpi, Paola Caroli, Federica Matteucci, Cristian Lolli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicole BrighiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Giuseppe SchepisiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9973-4869
Vincenza ConteducaUnit of Medical Oncology and Biomolecular Therapy, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6921-714X
Emanuela ScarpiUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-9267
Paola CaroliNuclear Medicine Operative Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Federica MatteucciNuclear Medicine Operative Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7455-6253
Cristian LolliDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-9179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There is an urgent need of biomarkers to personalize metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treatment. A new prognostic model described by our group combines molecular characteristics (ptDNA levels), metabolic features from PET-scans (metabolic tumor volume), clinical parameters (visceral metastases), and lab tests (lactate-dehydrogenase levels) in abiraterone or enzalutamide-treated patients. This study aims to validate the score on mCRPC patients undergoing taxane treatment. Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients affected by mCRPC, pre-treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, candidate for taxane-based treatments, have been prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent a basal PET/CT scan with F-choline and blood samples. The prognostic model previously described was applied to this population; based on the partial results of the parameters, we assigned the patients into three risk groups. Results: In the 28 patients evaluated, we observed a different median OS among the three risk groups (risk group I, 18.1 months [95% CI: 15.2-33.1 months]; risk group II, 12.7 months [4.9-18.6 months]; and risk group III, 10.1 months [3.4-15.4 months]; p = 0.012). Statistically significant differences were also observed for PFS. Conclusion: The prognostic score has confirmed to be a good prognostic tool also in a more advanced cohort of patients treated with taxanes. This tool may represent a valid method to refine prognostication and treatment selection in a cohort of patients where biomarkers are scarce.

Indexed as

cabazitaxelmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancerprognostic scoreptDNAtaxanes

Identifiers

PMID40438313
PMCPMC12117575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.