ReviewBurns & trauma2025
Multi-omics insights into bone tissue injury and healing: bridging orthopedic trauma and regenerative medicine.
Review in Burns & trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orthopedic Mechanophenotype: A Structured Narrative Review of Multiscale Biomechanics, Mechanotransduction, and Clinical Decision-Making.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Review
- Review
- Advances in cellular and molecular mechanisms of trauma-induced organ inflammation and dysfunction.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- RefinedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Advancements in bone marrow biopsy: the role of omics and artificial intelligence in hematologic diagnostics.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- FGFR2 identified as a NETs-associated biomarker and therapeutic target in diabetic foot ulcers.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To preserve functionality, bone is an active tissue that can constantly reconstruct itself through modeling and remodeling. It plays critical roles in the body, including maintaining mineral homeostasis, serving as the adult human body's core site of hematopoiesis, and supporting the structures of the body's soft tissues. It possesses the natural regeneration capacity, but large and complex lesions often require surgical intervention. Multiple omics integrate proteomics, metabolomics, genomics, and transcriptomics to provide a comprehensive understanding of biological processes like bone tissue injury and healing in bone tissue regeneration and engineering. Recently, bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicines have offered promising tools for bone regeneration using a multi-omics approach. Thus, this article will highlight the role of multiple omics in understanding bone tissue injury and healing. It will discuss the role of bone tissue engineering in developing bone substitutes that can replace translational medicine. Lastly, new developments in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, along with multi-omics approaches, offer promising tools for bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.