Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40438277›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Current state and challenges of multidisciplinary collaboration by fire defense headquarters in Japan: A nationwide cross-sectional survey.

Keiko Ueno, Daisuke Nishioka, Chie Teramoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keiko UenoDepartment of Social Epidemiology Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University Kyoto Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6199-135X
Daisuke NishiokaDepartment of Social Impact Assessment and Evaluation Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Chie TeramotoDepartment of Perioperative and Critical Care Management Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hiroshima Hiroshima Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The role of emergency medical service personnel has recently shifted, necessitating fire defense headquarters to engage in multidisciplinary collaboration with community organizations. However, evidence of this collaboration is limited. This study aimed to investigate the current state and challenges of multidisciplinary collaboration between fire defense headquarters and long-term care, welfare, and health organizations in the community. Methods: A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2023 among fire defense headquarters in Japan to examine their collaboration with long-term care, welfare, and health organizations, as well as the challenges encountered during collaboration. Descriptive statistics were used for numerical data, and a qualitative descriptive method was applied to text data. Results: A total of 529 participants, constituting a response rate of 72.9%, were enrolled in this study. A total of 445 (84.1%) fire defense headquarters collaborated with long-term care, welfare, and health organizations. The most common collaborating organizations were public health centers (62.5%), community comprehensive support centers (54.6%), and municipal departments of long-term care (40.0%). Challenges of collaboration included "cannot contact organizations during nights and holidays" and "cannot obtain patient information from organizations due to privacy reasons." Conclusion: Fire defense headquarters and community organizations should continue fostering collaboration, addressing challenges, and adopting best practices, which will help define the role of fire defense headquarters within local collaborative frameworks.

Indexed as

community health servicescross‐sectional surveyemergency medical serviceintersectional collaborationparamedic

Identifiers

PMID40438277
PMCPMC12117375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.