ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Timing of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advantages of TiRobot-assisted surgery in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: a meta-analysis based on multiple clinical indicators.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common in older populations, and cause pain and kyphosis, impacting patient quality of life. This study aimed to determine the optimal timing of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) for the treatment of OVCFs. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 120 older patients with OVCFs admitted to our hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of PVP surgery: Group A, within 7 days of the OVCF; Group B, 8-14 days after the OVCF; and Group C, 15-28 days after the OVCF. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale scores, the Oswestry Disability Index, vertebral height, Cobb angle, and complications were compared among the three groups. Results: PVP surgery within 7 days of the OVCF led to rapid pain relief and restoration of vertebral function; preoperative visual analog scale scores and the Oswestry Disability Index were significantly higher in this group compared with the other two groups, but no significant differences among the three groups were observed postoperatively. However, early surgery was also associated with a higher rate of bone cement leakage compared with the other two groups, whereas delayed PVP was associated with a greater incidence of deep vein thrombosis and urinary infections. Discussion: The timing of PVP surgery in the management of OVCFs impacts patient outcomes. Early surgical treatment may result in greater pain relief, improved vertebral function, and fewer complications, but patient-specific factors should be considered when determining the optimal surgical timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.