ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Effectiveness of the BOPPPS-MDT Model in Enhancing ECMO Training for ICU Staff: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Knowledge, Skills, and Teamwork Outcomes.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving therapy for critically ill patients, and effective training for ICU staff is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BOPPPS-MDT (Bridge-in, Objectives, Pre-assessment, Participatory Learning, Post-assessment, and Summary model integrated with Multidisciplinary Team) teaching model in enhancing ECMO training for ICU staff. Methods: A total of 108 ICU interns with diverse educational backgrounds and majors were randomly assigned to two groups: 54 in the control group and 54 in the experimental group. The experimental group received ECMO training using the BOPPPS-MDT model, while the control group received traditional training. Both groups underwent theoretical knowledge tests, performance evaluations, and satisfaction surveys. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group in 13 key theoretical knowledge areas (P < 0.05), case analysis, teamwork, and overall performance. The total score of the experimental group was significantly higher (P < 0.05). Cronbach's α ranged from 0.757 to 0.905, confirming high reliability. The satisfaction rate for the BOPPPS-MDT method was 92.17%, significantly higher than the 75.42% for the traditional method (P = 0.001). The BOPPPS-MDT method enhanced engagement, interactivity, learning interest, and teamwork. Conclusion: The BOPPPS-MDT teaching model significantly improved ECMO training outcomes and student satisfaction compared to traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.